Just one reading to introduce this:
John
3:1-17
Now there was a Pharisee named
Nicodemus, a leader of the Jews. He came to Jesus by night and said
to him, ‘Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from
God; for no one can do these signs that you do apart from the
presence of God.’ Jesus answered him, ‘Very truly, I tell you, no
one can see the kingdom of God without being born from above.'
Nicodemus said to him, ‘How can anyone be born after having grown
old? Can one enter a second time into the mother’s womb and be
born?’ Jesus answered, ‘Very truly, I tell you, no one can enter
the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit. What is
born of the flesh is flesh, and what is born of the Spirit is spirit.
Do not be astonished that I said to you, “You must be born from
above.” The wind blows where it chooses, and you hear the sound of
it, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it
is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.’ Nicodemus said to him,
‘How can these things be?’ Jesus answered him, ‘Are you a
teacher of Israel, and yet you do not understand these things?
‘Very truly, I tell you, we speak of
what we know and testify to what we have seen; yet you do not receive
our testimony. If I have told you about earthly things and you do not
believe, how can you believe if I tell you about heavenly things? No
one has ascended into heaven except the one who descended from
heaven, the Son of Man. And just as Moses lifted up the serpent in
the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever
believes in him may have eternal life.
‘For God so loved the world that he
gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not
perish but may have eternal life.
‘Indeed, God did not send the Son
into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world
might be saved through him.
Trinity
Ah the joys
of Trinity Sunday. We say that we believe in one God who is three
persons, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Yet for many
western Christians we are really only paying the belief lip service.
I've become quite fond of a saying that my doctrine lecturer, Jeremy
Begbie, made when trying to describe the Trinity. He explained that
in western thought, 'God is one, but unfortunately three.' And that more or less describes where
most of us are at. So I might as well say, 'Today I am going to
explain the Trinity, and tomorrow I shall nail some jelly to the
ceiling.' Nevertheless this is a vital part of Christian belief, so I
am going to try and do this justice for us, but maybe explanation
shouldn't be the whole story. What I mean by that is that anything
that I write is going to fall short of the truth. Jesus makes that
quite clear when he speaks to Nicodemus who represents us with our human questions. He speaks for the
Jewish leaders at this point, and many times when Jesus says 'you'
in this passage we should understand that the word he uses is plural,
so Jesus' answer is to all his earthly questioners.
So we learn that the leaders have
recognised very early on that there is something about Jesus that
indicates he is from God. This is a part of the story that John, the
Gospel writer, tells right from his opening words, 'In the beginning
was the Word.' Jesus doesn't deny this, but adds into the mix his own
comment about the Spirit of God that blows where it wills. Jesus then tells Nicodemus quite
blatantly that he is not going to understand this because he is
trying to think rationally as a teacher, but what he needs to do is
experience the reality by being born from above, by being born a
second time. This, then, is the rider that I'm going
to put on this: all Christian doctrine is an attempt to explain or
describe what we have experienced in a logical way, but what Jesus
seems to say is that we should not be overly concerned with
understanding because this is a spiritual thing which we will
struggle to understand in earthly terms because we have no frame of
reference.
Instead we have to experience the reality of Father, Son
and Spirit.
That is, therefore, my main priority,
to encourage us to engage with the Trinity rather than trying to
understand it first. We're only human and so there will be a limit
on what we can understand. Having said that, there is still merit in
having some understanding in order to avoid what we believe are some
of the pitfalls of getting it wrong, so it's worth spending a moment
on why we believe in the Trinity and what we do actually
believe.
So first of all, where does the belief
in the Trinity come from? It may come as a shock to hear that the word 'Trinity' does not come from the Bible. On the
very rare occasions where the phrase 'Father, Son and Holy Spirit'
does occur, it is usually thought of as a later addition and not
something present in the original text as written by the author.
How, then, did we get to it? Basically
it all comes down to combining experience with revelation. The first
Christians were all Jewish and Judaism, by the first century, had
become a monotheistic religion believing that there is only one God.
So all early Christians held this belief. It comes from something
called the Shema, a Jewish saying from Deuteronomy 6:4 which says:
'Hear, O Israel, YHWH is your God, YHWH is one.'
As an aside, the word used for 'one' is
the Hebrew word echad.
Almost everywhere in the Old
Testament that word literally and numerically means 'one'. But
there are some interesting places where it means something that is
one yet also more than one. The one most often quoted is from
Genesis 2:24:
'Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one (echad) flesh.'
I
mention this not because the Shema is hiding a doctrine of the Holy
Trinity. It isn't. But it is interesting that the concept of
oneness can have a mystical nature to it in the same way that a
married couple know they are connected in a way that they can't
really describe.
Anyway,
going back to the first Christians, their belief was that
there is one God. Yet
their experience of
that one God, as described in
both our Gospel and New Testament readings,
meant that the description didn't go far enough. Over
the course of more than three
hundred years, debates echoed loudly across Christianity
as theologians wrestled with
with the belief in one indivisible God, whilst noting the experiences
and references to Christ as being divine, especially as found in the
John's Gospel, and the numerous references to the Holy Spirit of God.
A
simple argument about the
divinity of Jesus is this: We say that only God can forgive, yet we
say that it is through Christ that we are forgiven. Therefore Christ
must be divine otherwise he
could not forgive. Of course
it can be a lot more complex than that, but in a nutshell that is at
the heart of many of our
beliefs.
So the
first Christians knew
God was one, yet they experienced and,
therefore,
wrote about three different
persons, and so from that combination emerged a belief in the Trinity
which is essentially that there is only one God, but within that one
God there are three separate persons who have
revealed themselves as the
Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
It's
important that we don't think of them as three different modes of
expression of God. Trinitarian belief is not
that there is one God who sometimes expresses himself as the Father,
sometimes as the Son and sometimes as the Holy Spirit. They
are all separate and
different persons, but
nevertheless they are
one God. Think
of it like this. The Father is God, but the Father is not the Son
nor the Holy Spirit. The Son
is
God but is not the Father nor the Holy Spirit, and the
Holy Spirit is God but is not the Son nor the Father.
The Father is one person,
the Son is another person and the Holy Spirit is the third person.
Yet all are also one
God.
How
can we possibly understand
that?
As I said, Jesus made
it quite clear that earthly logic is not going to help us understand
spiritual things because rational descriptions fall short of the
reality. That is not to say that spirituality should be full of
impossible paradoxes, but we shouldn't worry too much if we can't
fully describe something we're experiencing; that's par for the
course. But in
terms of how we can have three persons in one God, ask
yourself the question, what is a person? I think that the
answer is that a person is one who is conscious of themselves as
being distinct from someone else. So the Father is distinct in who
he is from the Spirit and the Son. However they are also all of one
essence; they are all one God.
What does this tell us about God?
At
its simplest level we know that God is a community based on love.
Each person is equal to the other but out of choice they defer to the
Father. When Jesus prayed that the church would be one as he and the
Father were one, see John's Gospel, this is what he was inferring,
that we would be a community based on love, united by the Spirit of
God. What this doesn't tell us about God,
though, is that the Trinity is not a formula that explains the
Godhead. It is merely the closest description that we can come up
with in language to describe something that goes beyond what we can
understand. Think of it along these lines. No matter how much a
mother tries to explain it to me, I will never know what it is like
to be pregnant. But that doesn't stop me puzzling over
the mystery of what it must be like to carry another human being
within one's self, and being caught up in the marvel of it.
I think the same thing applies with the
Trinity. It has withstood nigh on 1,700 years as an 'official' and
defining belief of the church, but I cannot believe that it is a
complete and total definition of how God is, purely because I don't
think it's possible for humans to fully comprehend the nature of God
like that, and that's something that Jesus made clear in his words to
Nicodemus. I don't think that it's necessary that
we understand it. Rationalism has influenced our culture in ways
that make us think everything can be, or should be, describable given
enough research. But the doctrine of the Trinity is something that
we celebrate as a mystery which can remind us of the
incomprehensibility of God.
Nicodemus, the rational teacher,
appears three times in John's Gospel. He becomes steadily more
sympathetic to Jesus each time, and I would venture to suggest that
this is not because he understands, but because he has seen the
evidence of his eyes and has become willing to go beyond his need to
understand. So let me encourage us to do the same
thing. The things of the Spirit transcend our rational
understanding, and to not accept something unless we can understand
it will be to limit what can be accomplished simply by engagement.
Don't be put off by mystery, but instead celebrate it and engage with
it.
The Father sent the Son, and the Father
and the Son sent the Spirit. We need little more than to say, 'Come
Holy Spirit'. The mysteries will take care of themselves, but the
proof is in the changes that take place within us.
No comments:
Post a Comment