1st
Sunday of Lent
Readings
Romans
10:13
For,
‘Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’
Luke
4:1-13
The Temptation of Jesus
Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit,
returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the wilderness,
where for forty days he was tempted by the devil. He ate nothing at
all during those days, and when they were over, he was famished. The
devil said to him, ‘If you are the Son of God, command this stone
to become a loaf of bread.’ Jesus answered him, ‘It is written,
“One does not live by bread alone.” ’
Then the devil led him up and showed
him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. And the devil said
to him, ‘To you I will give their glory and all this authority; for
it has been given over to me, and I give it to anyone I please. If
you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours.’ Jesus answered
him, ‘It is written,
“Worship the Lord your God, and serve only him.” ’
“Worship the Lord your God, and serve only him.” ’
Then the devil took him to Jerusalem,
and placed him on the pinnacle of the temple, saying to him, ‘If
you are the Son of God, throw yourself down from here, for it is
written,
“He will command his angels concerning you, to protect you”,
and
“He will command his angels concerning you, to protect you”,
and
“On their hands they will bear you
up,
so that you will not dash your foot against a stone.” ’
Jesus answered him, ‘It is said, “Do not put the Lord your God to the test.” ’
so that you will not dash your foot against a stone.” ’
Jesus answered him, ‘It is said, “Do not put the Lord your God to the test.” ’
When the devil had finished every test,
he departed from him until an opportune time.
The
bad Bible...
I
wanted to call this, 'The bad
Bible', which is, of course, intended to be a provocative title.
Perhaps
it would be better to use the phrase, 'Bad
use of the Bible'. Today
marks the first Sunday of Lent which is the season in which it is
intended that we look very closely at ourselves and our nature, and
what I want to do is to question the benchmark that we use to do
this. What
I mean by that is, how do we know that something is right or wrong in
our behaviour? I
mean, sometimes it's easy. If
I walk up to someone in the street who I've never seen before and put
them in an armlock before wrestling them down to the ground, that's
very clearly wrong because it's a use of unprovoked violence. But
what if I'd done that because I'd just seen that person lift
someone's purse out of a
handbag? I
take the same action, but now that we can see the motive for my
action, that changes whether it's right or wrong. I've
done the same thing but now it is an act of protection for
someone.
Or
how about this? This was a story I was told in a session on
situation ethics many years ago when, as a teenager and very
enthusiastic new believer, I went to a week-long Christian
conference. The speaker spoke
of
a very shy woman, very quiet and who always had her head in a book.
There is, of course, nothing wrong with that, except that for her it
was a way of keeping safe from the world, of not engaging with it.
And
then one day, quite out of character, she met a man to whom,
unexpectedly, she was very attracted. And again, quite out of
character, she had a one-night stand with this man. The
result of this single sexual encounter for the shy woman who never
left home was that her world suddenly opened up with a
self-confidence she had never before known and an experience that
left her wanting more out of life.
And
so she began to live.
She
began to make something more of her life. She began to become
someone who socialised and engaged with the world. Now
I remember being very shocked, as a new Christian, to hear this story
at what was a charismatic and evangelical conference. Surely sex
outside marriage was wrong, I thought. And especially a one night
stand of uncommitted passion. Yet
here was a leader who called that into question, and it began to get
me questioning, and to ask a question that I
continue to ask throughout
my adult life, which is this, what is the benchmark for right
behaviour? That is a question to which the answer you will normally
be given is, 'Well what does the Bible say?' And
that, I think, is when we begin to get into problems.
At
the beginning of Lent, what
does
the Bible say?
I
mean we live in an age when Christians are fighting against
Christians about all sorts of issues, but especially about the role
of women in leadership and human sexuality. Over
and over again I hear people say something along the lines of, 'The
Bible says that marriage is between one man and one woman.' Well,
yes it does... Eventually.
But
it also gives the following examples of marriage:
There
were plenty of polygamous
marriages
where a man has more than one wife. Granted that the tendency with
time was towards
one man and one woman, but King Solomon was not condemned for having
too many wives; he
was condemned
because he married women of other religions and followed their gods.
The
sin, according to what was written about him, was not the many wives,
but that he became unfaithful to God.
Then
there was Levirate
marriage
where a
widow with no sons was married off to her dead husband's brother.
Children of that union were legally counted as the children of her
first husband. And of course, she had no say in this. If
her brother in law was a brute, that was tough because her duty was
to have children for her dead husband so that there was someone for
his property to pass on to.
Then
in addition to polygamy, a man could also have several concubines.
These were a kind of secondary wife meaning that any children
conceived had no inheritance rights. Following
on
from that come the
more shocking examples, yet
these are not condemned but were culturally acceptable practices. So
female prisoners of war could be forced to become wives or
concubines, and unmarried victims of rape were forced to marry their
rapists. All of these came about because women were treated as
property in
the Bible.
This is something about which we violently disagree now, based on
ethical principles which we derive from our faith, yet those ethical
principles are fairly new.
The
point I am trying to make is that, when we are trying to decide upon
what is sinful behaviour, it is not as simple as looking in the Bible
for
a verse to guide us.
One has to execute judgement in the matter, and
have a good idea of the breadth of opinions expressed, and the
culture within which they were written.
And this is brought home for us in the story from Luke's Gospel
about the temptation
of Christ.
Jesus
is tempted by the devil with three different temptations. In
the first one the devil appeals to his relationship with God. Just a
few verses earlier, at his baptism, Jesus heard God say to him, 'You
are my Son.' So here the devil begins with 'If
you are God's Son.' So he begins by trying to sow a seed of doubt in
the relationship he has with God; did Jesus hear his
Father correctly?
The
second temptation is an appeal to be powerful and influential; all
Jesus has to do is ascribe honour and worship to the devil. But it
is the third one which most affects us here in the context of
understanding scripture because the devil quotes the Bible at Jesus.
Both
his
quotes
come from Psalm 91, and if you read the psalm as a whole it is all
about how God will protect those who love and trust him. It's
a wonderful psalm and can be very comforting. But what the devil
does with it is to take that one psalm on its own and make a theology
out of it in isolation. If you throw yourself off the top of the
temple, the angels will catch you because it says in the Bible that
they will. How
often do we hear that phrase, 'The Bible says...'
Now
if you are of a mind to use the Bible as your benchmark for what is
good behaviour, and that in itself is not
a bad
thing,
we have to be very mindful that this is the devil quoting scripture
at Jesus in order to justify a particular act. But Jesus rightly
quotes another bit of scripture back at him to
paint the whole picture.
And that is the essence of what I want to say here.
If
you use the Bible as your benchmark, then you must use the whole
Bible, not just a part of it, otherwise it will say exactly what you
want it to say. There's
another example in the new testament reading from Romans where Paul
quotes,
'Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.'
Hallelujah!
Praise God! Everyone,
without exception, who calls on the name of the Lord will
be saved. We
know it to be true because the Bible says it's so.
Except...
Jesus says in Matthew 7:21, 'Not
everyone who says “Lord, lord” will enter the kingdom of heaven,
but only one who does the will of my Father in heaven.' Jesus paints
a far more complete picture. It's not just about asking for
salvation, it's about responding and living as someone who has been
given it. To
understand our faith you need to know all the Bible,
So as we begin Lent, and as we start to consider the standards we
live by and how good we are at living to those standards, can I
encourage you to become far more fully engaged in learning the Bible
as a whole, not just the bits you can remember or which seem
palatable. Allow yourself to be challenged. If you are local to us,
the Pilgrim course for Lent is running through Lent on Wednesday
afternoons and Thursday evenings. I invite you to come and learn
more, that we may better understand what is asked of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment